The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Assessing what other people know and believe is critical for accurately understanding human action. Young children find it difficult to reason about false beliefs (i.e., beliefs that conflict with reality). The source of this difficulty is a matter of considerable debate. Here we show that if sensitive-enough measures are used, adults show deficits in a false-belief task similar to one used with young children. In particular, we show a curse-of-knowledge bias in false-belief reasoning. That is, adults' own knowledge of an event's outcome can compromise their ability to reason about another person's beliefs about that event. We also found that adults' perception of the plausibility of an event mediates the extent of this bias. These findings shed light on the factors involved in false-belief reasoning and are discussed in light of their implications for both adults' and children's social cognition.
منابع مشابه
Running Head: THE CURSE OF KNOWLEDGE The Curse of Knowledge in Reasoning about False Beliefs
Assessing what others know and believe is critical for accurately understanding human action. Young children find it difficult to reason about false beliefs—beliefs that conflict with reality. The source of this difficulty is a matter of considerable debate. Here we show that if sensitive enough measures are used, adults show deficits in the same kind of false belief task that young children fa...
متن کاملOutcome Knowledge and False Belief
Virtually every social interaction involves reasoning about the perspectives of others, or 'theory of mind (ToM).' Previous research suggests that it is difficult to ignore our current knowledge when reasoning about a more naïve perspective (i.e., the curse of knowledge). In this Mini Review, we discuss the implications of the curse of knowledge for certain aspects of ToM. Particularly, we exam...
متن کاملChildren’s and Adults’ Reasoning About Mental States
The ability to reason about mental states is critical for predicting and interpreting people’s behavior and for communicating effectively. Yet both children and adults exhibit some remarkable limitations in reasoning about mental states. In this article, I outline some of the parallels between children’s and adults’ fallacies in reasoning about the mind and suggest that a fundamental bias in so...
متن کاملChildren are cursed: an asymmetric bias in mental-state attribution.
Young children have problems reasoning about false beliefs. We suggest that this is at least partially the result of the same curse of knowledge that has been observed in adults--a tendency to be biased by one's own knowledge when assessing the knowledge of a more naive person. We tested 3- to 5-year-old children in a knowledge-attribution task and found that young children exhibited a curse-of...
متن کاملLIMITATIONS IN REASONING ABOUT FALSE BELIEFS IN ADULTS: THE EFFECT OF PRIMING OR THE CURSE OF KNOWLEDGE? Introduction
is influenced by their privileged knowledge about reality. When asked where a person described in a story would search for a missing object, participants tend to judge with higher probability that the person would search in a particular box when they know that the object is indeed in that box. However, the results of that experiment could be an effect of unintended priming in the experimental m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Psychological science
دوره 18 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007